Saturday, 31 July 2021

Matinee (1993) Movie Review

 Hey everyone! How are your weekends going so far? Mine's been pretty good. Today I'm here to review the 1993 film Matinee, directed by Joe Dante and starring John Goodman, Cathy Moriarty, Robert Picardo, Lisa Jakub, Simon Fenton, and Kellie Martin. So let's get right into it.


Matinee isn't a movie I grew up with. In fact, until about three weeks ago I'd never heard of it before. But Cinephile Studios, a YouTube channel that I'm subscribed to did a review of it and the movie intrigued me even though I'm not a huge fan of B-movie Horror films of the 50s and 60s, which this film is a love letter to. But I am a fan of movies, and this movie is also a love letter to the history of cinema. So, as I've been doing alot since the pandemic started, I bought the movie on iTunes and added it to my movie review queue to end off the summer of 2021. Honestly, I wasn't expecting much from this 1993 movie that I'd never heard of until I watched that Cinephile Studios video on YouTube. I ended up really enjoying myself.

This isn't the greatest movie ever, but it's a fun one. It's the kind of movie that, had I known about it at the time, I would've watched on VHS in 1994 or 1995. The only other movies I've seen that Dante has directed are Small Soldiers and Looney Tunes: Back in Action though I am aware of the Gremlins movies though I haven't seen either at the time of this writing (I have Gremlins 2 on VHS). Granted I was much older when those movies came out so chances are I might not have been allowed to watch Matinee if I knew about it when it first came out. I was only six years old at the time. Oddly enough this movie came out the day I was in Los Angeles on vacation, on the set of Star Trek: The Next Generation. So that was a nice little tidbit that has no relevance to this review. Lol. 

The cast in this movie is astonishing. One of the draws of this movie for me is the fact that John Goodman is in it. I mean he's one of those rare actors who is a pretty safe bet that any movie they're in is either going to be entertaining or at the very least they're going to be the best part of that movie. The rest of the cast is filled with performers that I'm a mixed bag on as to who I recognized, and who I didn't. The main cast I was actually pretty familiar with. Cathy Moriarty was in Casper, Lisa Jakub played Robin Williams's oldest kid, Lydia in Mrs. Doubtfire, and of course Robert Picardo is best known for playing the Emergency Medical Holographic Doctor on Star Trek: Voyager and in Star Trek: First Contact. Kellie Martin, who played Sherry in this movie, was the voice of Roxanne in A Goofy Movie. Simon Fenton, who plays the POV character, Gene Loomis, is the only main cast member I'm not familiar with. There were plenty supporting and background performers I wasn't familiar with, the exception being Dick Miller, since he's been in a few movies that I've seen, including Small Soldiers.

One of the things that I like about this movie is that it reminds us that the 60s wasn't always sunshine and roses. Especially from 1962 until 1969 with the Cuban Missile Crisis, which this movie takes place during, the JFK assassination in 1963, and the various civil rights movements that were happening in the latter half of the 1960s. And in a way it was startling to see just how similar people's lives were back then compared to now. Which is why I felt I could relate to the characters in this movie. Most of them anyway. Our lives were put on hold when COVID-19 hit in March 2020, and are still on hold in a way because the pandemic isn't over. Plus there as much social strife now as there was back then. The only real difference now is that, the United States and Russia aren't a finger away from nuking the entire world anymore. My point is this movie had some startling similarities to what's happening in the world today, though the methods are different.

There's really only one thing that I didn't like about this movie. I thought the Dick Miller and John Sayless characters were unnecessary. They're the ones trying to force people not to watch Lawrence Woolsey's movie, Mant! at the theatre. Which is fine, but they seemed to forget about it in the final act of the film. Again it's one of those things that is weirdly similar to things I see on Twitter on an almost daily basis, plus things like that were also happening in the 90s because there are also going to be people and groups of people who will try anything to convince people not to see a particular movie or TV show, or read a particular book because they themselves don't like it or it goes against their beliefs. I just felt that the movie, be it the script, or how Dante interpreted the script when he filmed it, didn't go far enough with that subplot for it to feel absolutely necessary to the rest of the film.

I'm actually surprised at how well this movie did with audiences and the critics. I mean usually films like this don't do well with critics but do extremely well with the audience, but this was a surprise to me. Mostly because it's not a movie I've heard people talk about aside from Cinephile Studios and James Rolfe from Cinemassacre (I watched his review of the film as well). My dad vaguely remembers hearing about it though he's never seen it, and my buddy Aaron saw it a long long time ago, but doesn't remember anything about it. Yet, the Cinephile Studios video is the first time I'd heard of the movie.


Matinee came out on VHS sometime in either mid-1993 or late 1993 (VHS Collector doesn't give a specific release date for the release) and I don't remember seeing it at the video store. We had moved out to the log house around the time the movie came out on home video so we weren't going to Rogers Video as often as we had when we still lived in the city, preferring to rent movies from a local gas station. So by then trips to Rogers Video were more infrequent than they had been in previous years. They still happened though since we rented the Green Ranger Saga from Mighty Morphin Power Rangers on VHS AND my parents rented Alvin and the Chipmunks Go to the Movies: Batmunk on VHS as well around that same time. I just don't remember seeing this movie on the shelf.

Overall Matinee was a fun watch. It's not the greatest movie ever, but I really enjoyed watching it. I would recommend it to those of you who are fans of the history of cinema as well as B-movie Sci-Fi and Horror films. It's a fun little period piece that is under two hours in length, which is cool. The cast is great, and it gets pretty funny at moments, but also introspective as well.

And that my friends is it for me for this week. I will be back next week though with my review of issues #7-12 of The Amazing Spider-Girl. I think I'm going to review Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory for next week's movie review. So until then have a wonderful rest of your weekend and I will talk to you all later. Take care.

Thursday, 29 July 2021

Thoughts on the Trailers for Dune, Marvel's What If...?, Star Trek: Lower Decks Season 2, Star Trek: Prodigy, and Ghostbusters: Afterlife

 Hey everyone, I'm back. This time I'm going to do something a little different. Rather than do four individual posts for each trailer, I'm going to do this one post on all of them and then post it once I've finished each one. So let's get into it, starting with Dune.


When Warner Bros. announced they were making a movie based on the 1960s science fiction novel Dune by Frank Herbert, I thought they were crazy. David Lynch had directed a movie adaptation of the novel in 1984 and it was a flop because people didn't care. Most general audiences haven't read the book and the fans of it weren't numerous enough or saw it enough for the movie to break even at the box office. I've read the novel and I don't care for it. I felt it's boring, and too long with uninteresting, bland, characters and convoluted plots. Which is why I'm mystified that WB is not only making a movie, but splitting that movie into two parts like they did for the movie adaptation of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows and expect part 1 to make enough money to warrant the release of the second one. According to Wikipedia, the budget for the movie is $165 million, which is actually pretty cheap given the cast of the movie and the special effects in the movie.

Visually the trailer looked gorgeous. But trailers are meant to attract your attention. And just because a movie looks amazing, doesn't mean the movie itself will be good. We can hope it'll be good, but it won't necessarily be good. Of the main cast of the movie, I think the only two people I'm not familiar with is Timothee Chalamet, who plays Paul Atreides, and Rebecca Ferguson, who plays Paul's mother, the Lady Jessica. Everyone else in the main cast are people I've seen in at least one movie in the last ten years or so. I have no interest in this movie at all. I hope it's good for those of you who are excited for it, but personally it's not for me. I might reread the book at some point before the movie comes out, to give it a second chance to win me over and I'll be watching the 1984 movie at some point as I have it on DVD.


How has nobody been talking about this trailer? I haven't seen a single thing about this trailer online at all. And it's been out for three weeks. How is that even possible? Obviously I knew it was coming out, but I didn't realize Marvel's What If...? is coming out in two weeks. Not that I've paid much attention to it since the MCU Disney+ shows are hit and miss for me, but even still I follow alot of bloggers and YouTubers and nobody, and I mean NOBODY, has even mentioned this trailer had dropped. Did people not know about it? I find that hard to believe given the immediacy of the internet these days.

This show looks amazing! I'm not a huge fan of "What If" stories, particularly in comic books. Mostly because many of them feel like fan fiction that anyone could've typed up on their laptop. Though I admit to being a sucker for some of the Batman Elseworlds stories that have popped up over the years. And I mean the whole premise of Spider-Girl is a "What If...?" story that started in 1998's What If...? #105 and I'm enjoying that world in The Amazing Spider-Girl. Like I said, the first episode drops in two weeks, so I'll definitely be checking it out. 


Season 1 of Star Trek: Lower Decks was probably the biggest surprise for me last summer. It was such a love letter to the 54 year legacy of Star Trek and was everything that the current slew of live action Star Trek shows weren't up to that point that I eagerly awaited each episode. With season 2 starting in two weeks (lots of shows coming out in two weeks) I am so excited to see the crew of the USS Cerritos again. My favourite part of this trailer is when Boimler is talking to a collector's plate of Tom Paris (voiced by Robert Duncan McNeill) while stuck in a Jefferies Tube. That would be stupid on any other show, including The Orville, but it works here because it comes from a place of love and that is why I love Star Trek: Lower Decks and am excited for season 2 to start.


I watched the teaser for Star Trek: Prodigy today for the second time, having watched it just after it dropped last week and my feelings on it are the same. The teaser is pretty generic, but I'm still looking forward to the show. At least to see what it's actually like since the teaser doesn't really give us a good sense of what it's going to be like. All it really did was reveal the starship that the new characters are going to be on. But take that ship out, and you've got a generic Sci-Fi series. Which is good, because you don't just want the kid version of the same old thing we've come to expect from Star Trek over the years. I also have to keep reminding myself that this show is for kids, and so it's going to be written differently than a show like Lower Decks or What If...? will be. Which is fine, but I don't know if it'll be written well enough that it won't bore the adults watching it as it seems shows aimed directly at kids end up doing sometimes. Even back when I was a kid, there were shows that were written with children in mind so much the writers forgot to make it interesting for the adults who would watch these shows with us. So hopefully Prodigy is more like the 2012 Ninja Turtles series, which was for kids, but adults could enjoy it too. 


My history with Ghostbusters is a little different than most people's. I didn't see the original 1984 movie until I was a teenager in the 2000s. However, I grew up watching Ghostbusters II on VHS, and The Real Ghostbusters and Extreme Ghostbusters on TV and loved all three of them. Not that I didn't love Ghostbusters when I finally saw it in 2002 or 2003 it's just I grew up with the more kid friendly versions of the Ghostbusters, and so, even though Ghostbusters II is considered to be an inferior film to the original, I still enjoy it for what it is because it's what I grew up with. So I don't have as much of a stake with Ghostbusters: Afterlife as some people feel they do. I still enjoyed the trailer though. The nostalgic elements didn't overshadow the new in this trailer, which is refreshing given how many trailers for movies that are sequels to, or reimaginings of, older movies, are overloaded with the old that the new elements don't get the chance to shine. One moment that I enjoyed is near the end of the trailer, when Ecto-1 is driving along and Mckenna Grace's character, Phoebe, pops out of the side of the vehicle, shooting her proton pack the way they used to do it on The Real Ghostbusters. It was usually Egon and/or Ray that did so while Winston or Peter drove. So that was REALLY cool. Sadly, I probably won't get to see it in theatres, but I'll definitely check it out once it hits home media.

That's it for me for today. What are your thoughts on these trailers? Let me know in the comments and we can talk about them. Otherwise I'll be back tomorrow for my review of the 1993 film, Matinee, starring John Goodman. Until then have a great evening and I will talk to you all later. Take care.

The Amazing Spider-Girl: Whatever Happened to the Daughter of Spider-Man? (Issues 1-6) Comic Book Review

 Hey everyone! How're you all doing today? I'm pretty good. I've got a few posts for you today. I've got four trailer reviews coming up later today, and this post is going to be the first in my series of comic book reviews on The Amazing Spider-Girl series that Marvel published from 2006 until 2009. I have all 30 issues of the series, and I've been wanting to talk about it for a while now so that's what I'm going to do. I'll be reviewing the series six issues at a time the way they're collected in the trade paperbacks. So without further ado let's talk about the first six issues of The Amazing Spider-Girl!

I wasn't reading new comics in 2006. I was volunteering at a local hobby shop that also sold comics, because we had to have 40 hours of community service in order to graduate from high school, but I mostly bought trade paperbacks and single issues of Batman related comics from the 90s and earlier in the 2000s. Back then I wasn't reading comics published by Marvel. Up to this point I only really knew about Spider-Man from reading a few issues and watching the 1967 cartoon and the 1994 animated series in the 90s, and then seeing Spider-Man in 2002 and Spider-Man 2 in 2004, and the X-Men from the first two movies that came out in 2000 and 2003 respectively. This was two years before Iron Man hit theatres, and six years before the MCU would explode with the release of The Avengers in 2012. Because of this, I didn't know that Spider-Girl was ever a thing as the most recent Spider-Man comic I had in my collection at the time was Spider-Man #87 from 1997 that had a cover date of January 1998. So I was almost ten years out of date with Marvel Comics, and the hobby shop didn't have these issues when I was going there. Even when Brad and I started going to the Comic Book Shoppe in 2009, this series was just wrapping up, or had wrapped up by that point and the first few trade paperback volumes were either out of print or just not available at that store.

Fast forward to 2013 or 2014, I was just starting to watch YouTube for more than just music videos and movies that were broken up into parts due to the time limit imposed on videos back then, and had discovered Geekvolution, which I've talked about on this blog before. I was going through some of their backlog of episodes of their comic book review show, The Comic Vault, and one of them I watched was one from 2012 where Captain Logan, by himself, reviewed these first six issues. So that's how I discovered Spider-Girl. Unfortunately the trade paperbacks were completely out of print, and nobody had the single issues so I wasn't able to get my hands on them. Then in 2019, Brad and I were at the Ottawa Comic and Card Show, which was a monthly event where people sold comic books and trading cards, with the occasional seller of novels and DVDs, but primarily comic books and trading cards. One of the tables actually had all thirty issues of this series plus the 0 issue which serves as a recap of the previous Spider-Girl series that started in the 90s. I wasn't going to pass up on this chance, so with Brad's help I bought the entire series and it's been in my longbox waiting for me to pull it out and read the entire series. I reviewed the first issue on my old blog, but never got around to reading the entire series. Until now.

In these first six issues we're introduced to May Parker, the daughter of Peter Parker and Mary Jane Watson, whose nickname is Mayday. Which is great because it helps to differentiate her from her great aunt, May Parker. Mayday has quit being Spider-Girl, due to the Hobgoblin having tried to kill her in Spider-Girl #100, and MJ freaking out as a result, as any good mother would. But, her sense of "With great power, must also come great responsibility" forces her to become Spider-Girl once again to stop the Hobgoblin.

I love these first six issues. They set up the characters so well and it allows you get invested in them without ever having read the previous series. I also like that Peter has become a forensics specialist for the NYPD. I thought it was too easy to just use the Hobgoblin as the villain right off the bat, but given this continues where Spider-Girl #100 left off, it wouldn't make sense for the villain to be anyone else. Plus, I like the Hobgoblin. I've never actually read any comics that he's in, but I remember him from the 1994 animated series as he showed up quite a bit on that show from what I can remember.

I also like the balance between the superhero stuff and the normal high school stuff which comic books and by extension comic book TV shows, tend to have a hard time doing. Unlike with Robin's supporting characters in the early issues of Robin in the 90s, Mayday's friends and classmates all feel like fleshed out characters with histories. Even if the way they were written came off as the typical cliche teenage stereotypes that were being written on shows like The O.C. and One Tree Hill. It still felt more fleshed out than Robin's friends and classmates did in the 90s. 

What drew me into the story though was Mayday's struggle to keep her promise to not be Spider-Girl anymore with her sense of responsibility as a person with super powers. Peter Parker had that struggle as Spider-Man all the time but it doesn't always work when you try to do it with other characters. It works here because Mayday is still a teenager and she's got a life at school with friends and activities. Which is an improvement from the way Peter was as a teenager when he first started out as Spider-Man while still in high school.

One of my absolute favourite scenes in these issues occurs in issue #2. Mayday is in detention for "skipping" class (she was fighting crime at the time), and MJ comes to get her, realizing that her friend, Courtney might be in trouble due to the Hobgoblin sending out his henchmen to confront any of the teenage volunteers who worked at the shelter, and gives her her Spider-Girl costume back, telling her she can be Spider-Girl again, as long as Peter doesn't find out. I both love this and hate this. I love it because it not only shows that MJ is going to support Mayday in her chosen profession as a superhero, but it also shows that she will do what it takes to get Mayday out in the field as Spider-Girl, including barging into detention and telling the assistant principal she's taking Mayday home. I felt like that was a very Beverly Goldberg thing to do. Lol.

The weakest issue for me in this first story arc was issue #3 with a villain called Bitter Frost. The issue felt like filler as it had almost nothing to do with the rest of the storyline. There were still some connections, but the overall plot of the issue had nothing to do with Hobgoblin's plot. It almost served as a practice issue for Mayday, since she hadn't been Spider-Girl for a few months and was out of practice.

Speaking of the Hobgoblin's plot, I thought it was kinda dumb in a way. So he's after this CD/DVD that contains all of Wilson Fisk's information that he used to run things as the Kingpin. Naturally that information would be very valuable to the Hobgoblin, who is trying to replace Black Tarantula as the current Kingpin, who also wants that information so that it doesn't fall into anyone else's hands, since Black Tarantula has no use for the information since he's already the new Kingpin. 

The character I like the least is Mayday's boyfriend, Gene Thompson, the son of, you guessed it, Peter's friend/former high school bully, Flash Thompson, and Felicia Hardy, a.k.a. the Black Cat. I thought we'd gotten away from the stereotypical jock and mean girl characters in recent teen dramas and comedies, but then I have to remember that this was published in 2006, at the height of the 2000s high school stereotypical trope. So I guess it works under that stipulation, but it still sucks reading this in 2021 when that's not really something we see on TV and in movies anymore. I hope he grows as a character as the series goes on, but honestly, judging by how things go at the end of this arc, I think Mayday will kick him to the curb in the next arc. I hope she does anyway.

The ads in these issues are interesting being they're from 2006 and I wasn't reading new comics back then as I already mentioned. For example, in issue #1 there's one for wall decorations for Pixar's Cars, which had just come out earlier that year. there's also an ad for Marvel children's costumes, featuring Spider-Man. The mask actually reminds me of Miles Morales's original costume from Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse with the eye holes. What's weird is that the Cars wall decorations ad is in the book twice. The second time it's in the inside of the back cover of the issue. I don't normally see comics that print the same ad twice. At least not in a really long time. I think I remember comic from DC from the early 2000s that has that, but I don't see it very often. In the other issues, there are ads for Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 on DVD which were actually re-releases that came out ahead of the theatrical release of Spider-Man 3, which there's also an ad for on the back of issue #6. There are also ads for other Marvel movies and TV shows on DVD as well. Issue #5 has an ad for Civil War #7. Yeah, this series started around the time Civil War was coming out. Which is bizarre to think about considering how the Marvel Universe changed because of that storyline. Most of the time I have to remind myself that it was Civil War II that came out in 2016, not the original Civil War.

That's all I have to say about this story arc. It's fantastic and I love that I get to continue with this series for four more weeks after this (there are five sections I'm splitting this up in). I think Marvel Unlimited has this series available, but I can't tell you for sure, because I don't have Marvel Unlimited. If you find any issue of this series in back issue bins or quarter bins or at any comic book convention or geek sale, PICK THEM UP because that's the only way you're likely going to be able to get this series, since the original trade paperbacks are out of print and they haven't been reprinted in a Complete Collection trade paperback edition yet like the original Spider-Girl series is right now. I'm excited to read the next arc. Especially because I have no idea what happens in the rest of the series. Nobody talks about this series, so I'm actually spoiler free on this series, which is great.

That's it for me for now. I'll be back in a little while for my trailer roundup where I'll be taking a look at the trailers for Dune, Star Trek: Lower Decks season 2, and Ghostbusters: Afterlife and the teaser for Star Trek: Prodigy. So stay tuned!  

Wednesday, 28 July 2021

Media Tie-In Novels: Canon or not?

 Hey everyone! How were your weekends? Mine was pretty good actually. My friend, Katie, came over on Monday afternoon and we played Mario Kart 8 Deluxe on my Nintendo Switch all afternoon. It was fun because it was the first time that I've been able to have her in the house since February 2020. So that was alot of fun. Today I thought I'd talk about something that many of us geeks know about. Media tie-in novels. If you don't know what these are, they're original novels based on a movie or TV show that usually deal with elements that the TV show or movie doesn't have time to deal with. Novelizations of TV episodes and movies are usually also included in this category, but I'm not really going to delve too deeply aside for two of them that I feel really contribute something to the overall story presented in the movie or TV show being adapted. This also isn't going to be an account of my personal history with media tie-in novels as I'll be doing that in another post somewhere down the line. Without further ado, let's get into it.


So the primary impetus for this blog post is that back in February TrekMovie.com reported that Pocket Books, the publisher that has been publishing novels based on Star Trek since 1981, is going to be publishing a trilogy of novels that is going to wrap up the Star Trek Literary Universe that began in 2001 with the Star Trek: Deep Space Nine novel, Avatar Book 1. The new trilogy will be called Star Trek: Coda and will begin publication in September of this year. I'll link the article at the end of this post for those of you who are interested. But it got me thinking about not only the Star Trek "Expanded Universe" of novels, but also the Star Wars Expanded Universe, both the original Legends continuity and the current continuity, and how fans of both franchises react to the novels and decisions such as this. Like I said, I'm not going to go into extensive detail of my own history with tie-in novels and I will largely be focusing on Star Trek and Star Wars since those are the novels that I've read the most of even though there are other franchises and shows that I've had at least one original novel for. 


The only tie-in novel series that isn't Star Trek or Star Wars, or geek related in any way, that I want to bring up are the ones based on Full House. As you may or may not know, I've been a fan of Full House since the show's original run in the late 80s to the mid 90s. Anytime they've brought it back in reruns, I watched it, I even started a watch through of the entire series on Netflix before I got sidetracked with other shows and movies and then got rid of Netflix because I found I was watching more on Disney+ than I was on Netflix. But I digress. Full House had three main book series. They are Full House: Stephanie, which focused on Stephanie Tanner's life and how she felt about her family and life, Full House: Michelle, which focused on Michelle, not that she needed a book series of her own since the TV show became increasingly Michelle centric as it went on, and Full House: Sisters which focused on both Michelle and Stephanie. Oddly enough, DJ didn't get her own book series either during the show's run or after. But, again, I digress. Back to Star Trek and Star Wars.


The very first original Star Trek novel was called Mission to Horatius and was published in 1968, during the show's final season. Originally it was meant to be a young adult book, much like the Starfleet Academy books in the 90s, but was retconned in 1996 as a "lost" novel in the TOS Pocket Books series following Pocket's acquisition of the publishing rights for the book. I've never read this book before and I don't really hear much about it either, but this was a standalone book published by Whitman Publishing, who were also responsible for the Gold Key Comics Star Trek series, which I talked about in a previous blog post.


Bantam Books, which would be responsible for the line of Star Wars novels in the 90s, published a series of novels that adapted episodes of TOS, that ran from 1967 until 1978. Unlike later episode novelizations, these books published multiple episode adaptations in a short story format rather than taking up an entire novel. All the books were published by James Blish, who also published the first original Star Trek novel from Bantam Books, Spock Must Die! which was published in 1970. This series of original novels lasted until 1981 when the Star Trek license was transferred to Pocket Books.


The Pocket Books run is probably the longest running media tie-in series that I know of. Not only did they publish novels based on Star Trek, but they also did The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, Voyager, Enterprise, Discovery, and Picard (for some reason there aren't any novels based on Star Trek: Lower Decks or the upcoming series, Star Trek: Prodigy). Picard is actually the reason the Star Trek Literary Universe is coming to an end, since the series takes place within the time period that the post-series novels of TNG, DS9, and Voyager as well as novel series like Star Trek: Titan take place in. Before I go further into the roles these novels play within the various franchises, let's head over to the Star Wars Universe and see the history of the Expanded Universe.


The very first original Star Wars novel that was published was Splinter of the Mind's Eye by Alan Dean Foster and was published by Del Rey in February 1978, only nine months after the 1977 theatrical release of Star Wars. Aside from the novelizations of Star Wars, The Empire Strikes Back, and Return of the Jedi, only seven Star Wars novels were published by Del Rey from 1978 until 1983. Six of them were trilogies, The Han Solo Adventures by Brian Daley, and The Adventures of Lando Calrissian by L. Neil Smith. With the movies coming to a close with Return of the Jedi in 1983, the novels ended with the final novel in The Adventures of Lando Calrissian, Lando Calrissian and the Starcave of ThonBoka. Aside from references to The Han Solo Adventures and The Adventures of Lando Calrissian in the final two books in the Han Solo Trilogy, these novels were largely ignored by the Bantam Books series that ran from 1991 to 1999, with Splinter of the Mind's Eye being ignored entirely due to the dynamic between Luke and Leia as this book was written before the revelation in Return of the Jedi that they're brother and sister.


Unlike the Star Trek tie-in novels there was a huge gap in Star Wars publications from 1983 when the Del Rey license ended, and 1991 when Heir to the Empire by Timothy Zahn came out. With pretty much everything Star Wars having ended by 1986 there wasn't much reason to continue publishing the novels. Which is why it was a gamble to publish Heir to the Empire in the first place as nobody was sure if people still cared about Star Wars and would even buy the novel. The answer turned out to be yes to both questions and the success of Heir to the Empire basically cemented Star Wars's place in the publishing world.


In 1997 the publishing license shifted back to Del Rey though Bantam continued to publish Star Wars novels until 1999 with the short story compilation, Tales from the New Republic, being the final Star Wars book to be published by Bantam. The result of Del Rey gaining the Star Wars license back was the 1999 novel, Vector Prime, which was the first novel in a 19 book series known as Star Wars: The New Jedi Order. While Splinter of the Mind's Eye was still ignored, as was The Adventures of Lando Calrissian, The Han Solo Adventures trilogy was brought up again with a few characters from that trilogy appearing in The New Jedi Order. It was around this time that Lucasfilm Licensing married the Del Rey and Bantam continuities into one cohesive timeline, something the Star Trek novels never bothered trying to do at any point in the last 53 years.

Both franchises had novelizations of their movies with Pocket Books also publishing novelizations of certain episodes from each series, minus TOS, which had the early episode short story adaptations published by Bantam in the 60s, and Star Trek: The Animated Series which had been adapted in the Star Trek Logs series by Alan Dean Foster, and published by Del Rey in the 70s. I decided to not really talk about the novelizations because I feel they're either too different from the films they're adapting, or they don't add anything to the films. However, there are two movie novelizations, one from each franchise, that I'd like to highlight.


The first is the novelization for Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. The reason I highlight this particular Star Trek movie novelization is because it adds additional details that didn't make it into the theatrical cut of the film, and was only briefly touched upon in the director's cut of the movie which was first released on DVD in 2002. For example, the novel reveals why Scotty was so attached to Cadet Peter Preston, the young trainee, whose body Scotty brought to the bridge following the initial battle between the Enterprise and the Reliant, which had been commandeered by Khan. Preston was Scotty's nephew, but that detail is left out of the theatrical version of the film which was also released on VHS, Laserdisc, CED, and DVD in the 80s and 90s but was restored for the director's cut in 2002. So this novelization fills in gaps like that, some, like Saavik's connection to Preston, which wasn't in either versions of the film. 


The novelization for Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace mostly includes extra, or deleted scenes, like Anakin's earlier podrace, briefly mentioned when Anakin is getting ready for the race we see in the movie. Which is cool, but there's one thing told in this book that has an impact on Star Wars publishing moving forward. In 2006 the first novel in a trilogy, Path of Destruction came out. The book is set in the distant past of the Old Republic and stars a character named Darth Bane. Darth Bane was created by George Lucas as backstory in preparation for Episode I, and was introduced in the novelization by the book's author, Terry Brooks. Of course Drew Karpyshyn wrote the three Darth Bane novels in the late 2000s and a version of the character appeared as a Force Specter in the sixth season of Star Wars: The Clone Wars. Which is one example of the Star Wars Expanded Universe having influence on the movies and TV shows. 

Now I kinda wanna go over the canonicity of each franchise's tie-in novels because how canon each one is pretty much determines how fans reacted to each being ended or decanonized by their respective owners. Until Episode I came out in 1999, the novels and comics were the only thing keeping Star Wars alive as there weren't any movies or TV shows coming out. As a result fans saw them as basically being canon, especially the novels that took place after Return of the Jedi as George Lucas had made it pretty clear by 1991, when Heir to the Empire was published, that he would not be making a sequel trilogy. Mainly because he'd be almost into his 70s by the time he started working on the sequels given it had taken him ten years each to make the previous film trilogies. However, Lucasfilm Licensing, which handled the licensing of the Star Wars franchise, has flip-flopped between the Expanded Universe being canon, and the Expanded Universe not being canon, never really giving a definitive answer, leaving fans just figuring that the Expanded Universe, which encompassed novels, comic books, TV shows (Droids, Ewoks, and the Ewoks TV movies were not considered canon), and video games, was all canon with a tier level, determining how canon a piece of media set in the Star Wars Universe was compared to the movies).

Star Trek on the other hand was slightly different. While the novels, and comics, kept interest in Star Trek alive in the 70s, Paramount and Gene Roddenberry were always planning something to do with Star Trek, and the reruns of TOS were constantly on TV, so Star Trek didn't disappear after TOS ended in 1969 the way Star Wars did after the release of Return of the Jedi in 1983. On top of that Gene didn't like many of the comics and novels based on his series, so he declared that novels and comics would not be canon, with the TV shows and movies being the absolute authority on continuity in the Star Trek Universe. Amazingly enough Paramount has kept that decree, even now, thirty years after Roddenberry's death.

Because of this, the way fans reacted to the end of the original Star Wars Expanded Universe, now known as Legends, and the Star Trek Literary Universe are completely different. Because of Roddenberry's declaration so early on, fans have accepted that the novels and comic books are their own thing, even from each other with very few crossovers between the two mediums. They've accepted they're non-canon to the TV shows and movies. That doesn't stop Star Trek fans who read the novels and comics from enjoying them. I think that's because we were told from the very beginning that the novels and comics were their own continuity with no crossover to the TV shows and movies and we were told this consistently. Star Wars fans on the other hand are a whole different story.

I remember back in 2014 when Lucasfilm announced that the Expanded Universe was going to be discontinued due to the fact that the majority of the novels and comics would be contradicted by the sequel trilogy and it would free new authors to come up with new stories taking place in parts of the Star Wars timeline that were pretty full with previous novels and comics. The fan outrage was palpable. I'm a fan of the Legends continuity. How could I not be? I mean, aside from home video, and the theatrical releases of the Special Editions in 1997, there was no new Star Wars. George Lucas was slowly working on Episode I, but we'd be lucky if it came out before the year 2000. So those novels were my way of experiencing new Star Wars stories. Especially the only way to get new stories featuring Luke, Leia, Han, Chewie, Artoo, Threepio, and Lando since it was pretty clear at that point we were never going to get a sequel trilogy.

The other problem is that Lucasfilm was pretty inconsistent with how canon they considered the EU to be. George Lucas himself was pretty consistent on his stance when it came to the EU. He enjoyed it, and even used elements introduced in the EU in the movies, like Coruscant in the prequels and the Special Edition of Return of the Jedi, and Dash Rendar's ship, Outrider, from Shadows of the Empire in the expanded Mos Eisley scene in the Special Edition of Star Wars: A New Hope, but he considered them to just be fun side stories that had nothing to do with his movies. Lucasfilm, on the other hand were more inconsistent with their policy. From what I can recall from talking with other Star Wars fans online and reading the canon policy on Wookieepedia, the Star Wars Wiki, there was a point where they went with George's assessment. It wasn't until the late 90s and early 2000s, when it became clear that George had no intention of making the sequel trilogy, they began changing that policy. By the late 2000s Lucasfilm considered the novels and comics to be canon, even though George's opinion on the matter hadn't changed. I mean they even had two people, Leland Chee, and Pablo Hidalgo working as the keepers of the Star Wars continuity chronicle, the Holocron. This was an internal document that kept every detail, character, ship, planet, and piece of equipment straight for use as reference material by people writing for the Star Wars Universe. 

In my mind Lucasfilm never really committed to what was canon and what wasn't canon in the Star Wars Universe. Which led to alot of problems when it came time to decanonize the Expanded Universe in order to write the sequel trilogy. I don't understand the hate though given Lucasfilm would've had to do that whether George Lucas was making his sequel trilogy or Disney made the sequel trilogy we got. In Disney's case, the movies Rogue One and Solo contradict several EU sources that chronicle how the Rebel spies mentioned by Vader in A New Hope got the Death Star plans, as well as Han's backstory as a younger man. And since they're both movies, the novels, comics, radio shows etc. had to go because they no longer fit into continuity.

Personally, I've enjoyed the novels and comics of both Star Trek and Star Wars over the years, but I've considered them to be their own thing. With Star Wars I didn't care one way or the other, because I knew I could enjoy them on their own level and they'd still be there for me to enjoy whether movies knocked them out of canon from the movies. For Star Trek, I've always gone with what Paramount says about it. It's easier that way. Especially since there's so many TOS novels and comics out there you can't possibly fit them all into a cohesive timeline. Especially when some novels contradict other novels, or contradict comic books and vice versa.

So those are my thoughts on media tie-in novels for Star Trek and Star Wars. It's kinda rambly, but that's okay because I'm a geek and we like to ramble on about things like this. What are your thoughts on Pocket Books ending the continuity that has built up in the Star Trek novels over the last 20 years now that Star Trek: Picard has contradicted many of the novels for TNG and Voyager? Please let me know in the comments below, or wherever you clicked on this post from. I'll be back tomorrow for my review of issues 1-6 of The Amazing Spider-Girl, "Whatever Happened to the Daughter of Spider-Man?". So until then have a wonderful evening and I will talk to you all later. Take care. 

Link to Article

https://trekmovie.com/2021/02/22/next-star-trek-picard-novel-tells-rios-backstory-coda-trilogy-wraps-up-post-nemesis-litverse/

Saturday, 24 July 2021

I Am A Geek

 I am a geek! The title of this article says it all. I am a geek! I've always been a geek. As many of you know, I grew up differently than most people my age. Due to my numerous health issues and physical condition, I spent much of my childhood in the hospital and going to doctors appointments, medical procedures and scans. And many times I ended up in isolation because my health was such that either my immune system was so compromised that I could become deathly ill if I just caught a simple cold while playing with other kids, or I had an infectious disease that could be passed on to other children if I was around them. So while the other kids were playing sports, or running around the neighbourhood, I was inside at home or in the hospital, or outside in the backyard, playing with toys, reading books and comics or watching TV or movies. Listening to music was a big thing for me as well.

Star Trek, Star Wars, Batman, Power Rangers, Barney, Teddy Ruxpin, Disney and the Berenstain Bears were just some of my favourite things when I was a kid. I watched or read them every day of my life, even when I was at school, because some of the classrooms had Disney and Berenstain Bears books in them. They kept me entertained and occupied in between appointments, or while I waited for a nurse to come in and help me with my routine at the hospital. Being a geek got me through the worst moments in my life, be it a difficult hospital stay, growing up in general, or the torment of high school. 

I wasn't always proud to be a geek though. In fact, there was a time when I was ashamed to be a geek. I was ashamed that I wanted to see Atlantis: The Lost Empire and Lilo & Stitch, that I was eagerly awaiting the Star Wars prequels, that I enjoyed watching Star Trek: Enterprise, Smallville, Andromeda, Stargate SG-1, and Mutant X, and I enjoyed reading Batman and Superman as often as I could manage. Since I name dropped the shows and movies that I did, you can guess when my time of being ashamed to be a geek was. When I was in high school and college from 2001 to 2010. When I wanted to start dating, get along with my classmates, whether we had the same interests or not, and when being a geek wasn't cool.

Back then comic book and superhero movies were just starting out with incredible Marvel movies like X-Men and Spider-Man, when Star Trek was on it's way out because the fanbase didn't like Enterprise, when The WB was using Smallville as a way to gauge interest in characters published by DC Comics, when Harry Potter was huge as the book series wrapped up and the movies were going strong, and when Star Wars was being experimental outside of the movies with novel series like The New Jedi Order and The Clone Wars micro-series on Cartoon Network. Even while the prequel trilogy was crashing and burning with Attack of the Clones. Doctor Who also came back during this period.

The reason I was ashamed to be a geek is because I was teased and harassed by people at school, both in high school and in college, even while movies like The Dark Knight and Iron Man dominated the box office in 2008. My high school was a very sports oriented school, especially in 2004 when we got a principal that was a huge sports fan. All I wanted to do was fit in with my peers because I was already sticking out simply because I was the only person in my high school who was in a wheelchair. Especially since, like I said, I wanted to have a girlfriend.

It wasn't until Ottawa Comiccon began in 2012 that I began to shake off the shame I felt for being a geek, because suddenly, I wasn't alone. There was an event that was local that was meant to celebrate everything that was geeky and 22,000 geeks were in attendance during that first 2 day event alone. 2012 was also a transformative year for geekdom as The Avengers, The Dark Knight Rises, and The Amazing Spider-Man dominated at the box office, Disney announced they'd bought Lucasfilm from George Lucas and were planning to make more Star Wars movies, and Arrow began airing and not only launched a successful shared TV series universe known as the Arrowverse but also ushered in a new era of comic book based TV shows that continues to this day. I've been a proud geek ever since. 

Being a geek has never been about the large online communities for me. Because I began my geek journey by watching Star Trek: The Next Generation with my family and talking about Star Wars and Animorphs with friends when I was in the sixth grade, I've always preferred having a small group of friends to talk about geeky things with, or to talk about them one on one with a single person. For example I prefer chatting on Facebook Messenger with Aaron or Jonathan or on Facebook Video Chat with my sister Andrea or my friend, Danielle,  about geeky things than I do on online forums and Facebook groups. Especially these days.

It took me a long time to once again be proud to be a geek. I had to wait for geek culture to become mainstream with the MCU, Disney+, and the Arrowverse, and that took decades. It didn't help when shows like The Big Bang Theory portrayed us as crazy people that sought to prove that we're superior to non-geeky people.* But it finally happened. And I'm glad it did because it was hard growing up as a geek who was also physically disabled and was autistic. Especially when I was frequently the only kid in my school was disabled. 

I am a geek and proud of it. Starting in August I am going to do a series of posts on a particular franchise every month. For each franchise, I will focus on one aspect of it for each week of the month. The aspects will be: TV shows/movies, comic books, books, and video games. These are not reviews. Instead this will be a chronicle of how I experienced these franchises. For example, in August I'll be focusing on Star Trek and I'll be going into where I started in the franchise. So if I saw a movie in theatres, or how I watched a particular TV show etc. So like the first season of Star Trek: The Next Generation is more ingrained into my brain because I had most of it on VHS when I was a kid and watched those tapes on repeat all the time. So please join me for My Journey as a Geek. 

If you're a geek, I hope you're proud of it. It's great being geek. It's brought me together with some amazing people who are some of my closest friends ever. Even though I prefer the smaller conversations with friends and family, it's a great sense of community that I don't think I would necessarily get anywhere else. And that my friends is truly special. Take care.

Friday, 23 July 2021

Snow Day (2000) Movie Review

 Hey everyone! How're you all doing today? I'm doing quite well. It's Friday, which means I'm here to do a movie review. This week I'm going to be taking a look at a movie from the year 2000 called Snow Day starring a Who's Who of actors from the 80s, 90s, and 2000s. So let's get into it.


Snow Day is about just that. A snow day. For those of you who are too young to know what these are, snow days were when we got a day off of school because there was too much snow on the ground for people to be able to leave their homes. On these magical days we did whatever we wanted because we didn't have the communications technology that we do now, so our teachers had no way of sending us our schoolwork. When I was in high school we had computers and the internet was a thing, but trying to send anything by e-mail was slow and it just wasn't feasible to send documents that way the way we were able to only seven years after this movie came out when I was starting college. School servers were also fickle things as well since oftentimes the technology couldn't support such a system.

There are four storylines running parallel to each other. The first has to do with Tom Brandston (Chevy Chase) who is a weather reporter, struggling to outwit rival weather reporter Chad Symmonz (John Schneider). The second is about Tom's son, Hal (Mark Webber) who is trying to get  his crush, Claire Bonner (Emmanuelle Chriqui) to notice him with the help of his best friend, Lane Leonard (Schuyler Fisk) while avoiding Claire's ex-boyfriend, Chuck Wheeler (David Paetkau) only to discover that Lane has feelings for him and that his love for Claire is actually for Lane instead (high school romances are weird). The third plot has to do with Tom's daughter, Natalie (Zena Grey) trying to stop the snow plow driver, Roger (Chris Elliot) from plowing the streets so that they'll have two snow days in a row with the help of her friends, Wayne (Josh Peck) and Chet (Jade Yorker). The final plot, being the smallest plot in the entire film, has to do with Tom's overworked wife, Laura (Jean Smart) attempting to work from home while taking care of the youngest member of the Brandston family, Randy (Connor Matheus).

I'll start with Laura's storyline because, like I said, it's the shortest of the four of them. It's fine. I don't really have much to say about it since it doesn't take up much time within the film and it ends before the other three storylines do. One thing I noticed about this storyline is that Laura keeps in touch with her office via video chatting the way people use Zoom for meetings nowadays. I know we had webcams back then, but being early 1999 when this movie was filmed (it has a release date of February 11th, 2000), the internet capabilities we had back then were not conducive to having long video calls the way we do now. I mean my family was on dial-up until sometime in 2006 or 2007, just before I started college. She also had a cell phone that could connect to other countries. Was that possible back in 1999 and 2000? Like I said, it was a decent storyline.

Tom's storyline is kind of the same in a way. While it goes longer than Laura's does, it's clearly not the central focus of the film, since this is a movie aimed at kids. It is fun to see Chevy Chase go up against John Schneider though. At this point Schneider had gone up against Boss Hogg and Rosco on The Dukes of Hazzard and would take on the Luthors and Jor-El on Smallville only a year and a half later. But he couldn't beat Chevy Chase. Not that he actually tried, but it was still fun to watch.

Natalie's story is the weakest of the four. The characters are fine and the actors are pretty great but kids trying to prevent a snow plow driver from doing his job, just so they can have an extra snow day is kind of weak. It's funny at moments, but a touch unbelievable as a snow plow driver doesn't make for a very good villain. This is produced by Nickelodeon though, so they have this kind of "villain" in many of their shows and movies especially around this era. 

My favourite of the four storylines is Hal's. I think it's because I can relate to both him and Lane in a weird way. While I was a teenage boy who wanted to go out with a certain type of girl when I was in middle school and high school, and that type of girl didn't reciprocate those feelings, I was also a person who had a crush on a friend, but they'd be trying to date someone else without even realizing that I wanted to go out with them. I also feel bad for Claire as well, because she's being chased by all these guys who think she's pretty, but don't know anything about her, has to deal with her ex-boyfriend who is a jerk, AND has this stalker dude (Hal) who creepily knows more about her than Chuck does, even though she and Chuck had been together for three years. I'm actually kind of surprised that Chuck doesn't terrorize the younger kids on snow days.

The cast in this movie is insane. Every few minutes it felt like I saying "I recognize that person!" much like I was doing when Katie and I watched Freaky Friday (1976) on Disney+ a few months ago. I mean you have veteran actors with Chevy Chase, John Schneider, Jean Smart, and Chris Elliot, the teen actors who were starting to transition into adult and college age roles, and then the younger up and coming cast members who would be in various movies and TV show roles throughout the 2000s. Obviously I know Chevy Chase from the Vacation movies, as well as Community and a cameo in Sesame Street Presents: Follow That Bird!, I know John Schneider from The Dukes of Hazzard and Smallville, I remember seeing Jean Smart in a later season of Frasier as well as the 2004 film Garden State, and Chris Elliot played Lilly's dad on How I Met Your Mother in several episodes. After this movie I'd end up seeing Mark Webber as Stephen Stills in the 2010 film Scott Pilgrim vs. The World, and Emmanuelle Chriqui is currently playing Lana Lang on Superman & Lois.

Other cast members that show up in this movie I recognize more from other people talking about them. Like Josh Peck I'm not overly familiar with as I've never seen Max Keeble's Big Move or the TV show Drake & Josh. Zena Gray is also in Max Keeble's Big Move. Then there are two actors that I only know from things after this movie, aside from Mark Webber and Emmanuelle Chriqui. They are David Paetkau, who I know from the Canadian police drama, Flashpoint where he played Sam Braddock, who was with Amy Jo Johnson's character, Jules, as well as the ghost of Beck McKaye on the Canadian teen drama Whistler alongside Amanda Crew. The other cast member that I know from other things first is Carly Pope, who played Susan Williams, a reporter that Oliver ends up dating on Arrow during season 5. 

Schuyler Fisk, who plays Lane in this movie, isn't in anything else that I've seen. She's in the 2002 teen film Orange County but I've never seen it. I've just heard about it because Jack Black is in it. And I think it's the reason The O.C. couldn't've been called Orange County or it inspired Josh Schwartz to call the show The O.C.? I don't actually know, I just remember that movie having some sort of connection to The O.C. that Josh Schwartz mentioned in one of the bonus features on the DVDs or in an interview somewhere. Either way I've heard of Orange County but I haven't seen it. Apparently Carly Pope is also in that movie oddly enough.

This movie is very much a late 90s or early 2000s kids film. The kind my siblings I watched alot when we were kids. 2000 is a weird year because there's still tons of 90s stuff still around, but it doesn't quite start the advancements in technology that we'd see in the 2000s and the first half of the 2010s. So it's sort of a best of both worlds sort of thing. Which I like alot.


 Before last night's viewing I'd seen Snow Day only twice. Both in the 2000s. My parents rented it for me on VHS back in like late 2000 or sometime in 2001, not long after the movie had been released on home video. I don't remember why they rented it for me or if my siblings watched it with me, but there must've been something going on that I couldn't participate in for whatever reason, so my parents rented it for me as a special personal movie night. I remember enjoying it. Then, a few years later, once I had the TV/VCR combo set in my bedroom, so sometime between 2002 and 2006, I actually saw the movie on TV one weekend and watched it again. 

It's not the greatest movie ever, but it's fun. At only an hour and twenty-nine minutes, this movie went by pretty quickly. I wouldn't necessarily recommend it to you, especially if it's not a movie you're even vaguely familiar with being that you didn't grow up during that era or had kids during that era. Overall I had a great time revisiting this film. It was cheesy and stupid but I like those kinds of movies and the characters were fun. It also serves as a time capsule, because kids today don't get snow days the way I used to get them when I was a kid.

And that is going to be it for me for this week. I'll be back next week with another comic book review where I'll be talking about the first six issues of The Amazing Spider-Girl and then for next week's movie review I'll be reviewing the 1993 film Matinee starring John Goodman. So until then have a great weekend and I will talk to you all later. Take care.

Thursday, 22 July 2021

My Thoughts on DC Comics and the DC Extended Universe

 Hey everyone! How's it going? I'm doing pretty well. I've gone on record elsewhere on this blog stating my opinion of the future of the MCU and how I feel about Marvel in general being that...well...I didn't grow up with Marvel except the occasional Spider-Man comic, i.e. only three of them, and the Spider-Man animated shows from the 60s and 90s. I've also gone on record elsewhere on this blog stating my opinion on the future of Star Wars as a franchise and what I am and am not interested in going forward. But, I haven't talked about DC Comics outside of my love of Batman and how I grew up watching reruns of the 1966 TV series and watching the 1966 movie on repeat. So that's what I'm going to do today. I'll be touching on the comics, the TV shows that I watched (and still watch) from the last decade, and the DC Extended Universe. Let's get into it.


I started reading DC Comics publications at a fairly early age. From 1984 until 1996 DC published comics based on Star Trek and Star Trek: The Next Generation and my dad started buying them for me in 1992 when I was five years old. These comics were also my first exposure to superheroes as they'd be filled with ads for other DC Comics titles, as well as events like The Death of Superman and Knightfall. Plus the DC subscription order forms included the characters on them (I'll be showing an example of this a little later on). My first time seeing Batman was the 1966 TV series which was in reruns on YTV at the time while the movie based on the show was shown on the PBS station we picked up at the time so my dad taped it for me. 


Besides Batman: The Movie, the first Batman movie I ever saw was Batman Returns. My parents were smart enough not to take me to see it in theatres when it first came out, but I ended up seeing it on VHS when I was in the hospital. It was so dark and so intense that it scared the crap out of me and set me up to have an intense dislike of dark, scary, super violent films for life. But it was that 1966 TV show and 1966 movie that I fell in love with Batman as a character. 


Over the last few decades, I've bought alot of non-Star Trek DC comics. Batman, Superman, Green Arrow, the Flash, and Justice League are all characters that I enjoy reading about as well as certain eras of the Teen Titans and some eras of the Birds of Prey and Batgirl as well. However when the New 52 started in 2011 I started to become disillusioned with the way DC editorial was starting to handle the books on a story level. I didn't mind that they felt they needed to reboot the universe since things had gotten pretty convoluted since Crisis on Infinite Earths came out in the mid 80s. Oddly enough Crisis was supposed to resolve the problems created by decades of continuity. My problem with the material that DC has been publishing in the last decade is how dark, brooding, and not fun these characters have become.


This is the DC Comics subscription form I mentioned earlier. I fell in love with the way these characters looked because they were bright and cheerful looking, even if the characters themselves weren't silly and goofy. That, to me anyway, is how comic books should look. I understand that layouts change over the course of decades, but think about this for minute. DC Comics began in the 1930s with Superman debuting in 1938. for sixty years DC's look maintained that bright, cheerful look, even when some of the books they published were more adult with darker themes and the brightness of a character's costume would also depend on who the colourist is at the time. Batman's cape and cowl have both been various shades of blue over the decades, occasionally becoming black. But they've always been vibrant. Even in the 2000s, DC's bright, cheerful colours have kept me going back to try out their books in a way that Marvel has never been able to do. 

Superheroes are supposed to represent the very best that Humanity has to offer. They're supposed to represent the traits that we, as people, wish we had, or that we do have, but lack a little bit in. They're supposed to be our protectors from the world outside our windows. Marvel, and DC in the last decade, aren't those things. And I mean the diversity. In fact, I am extremely glad that more superheroes of other ethnicities are being created, because those groups have been sorely under represented in comics. Both in the universes, and on the creative side. Batman helped my parents teach me about morality and finding other ways of dealing with your enemies than simply killing them. Yes, I saw him in movies and on TV before I ever picked up a comic book, but the fact of the matter is, Batman had an impact on me that no other comic book character has. I've always said that DC characters are who we want to be but Marvel characters are who we ARE. And I feel like that's no longer true. Because they're all the same.


I still check in on my favourite DC characters from time to time, just to see what they're up to in the comics. But I no longer seek them out on a regular basis like I did pre-New 52. Before the reboot in 2011, I had five or six Batman books that I was buying as regularly as I could manage. I didn't care for Scott Snyder's run on Detective Comics as I wasn't interested in the crime thriller that he started there, and continue exploring in his New 52 run. But, I was buying Batman, Batman and Robin, Batman: The Dark Knight, Batman Incorporated, and Batgirl with a few issues of Detective Comics from time to time. But I was buying these books on an almost weekly basis in 2010 and 2011 once Brad and I started making almost weekly trips to the comic book store. That's no longer the case. Even before the pandemic. Now I'm going to talk about the DCEU, then I'll talk about the TV shows. There's a sharp contrast between the two of them...sort of.


I saw Man of Steel in theatres when it first came out back in 2013. My brother, sister, and I saw it together as a sibling activity. I'd never seen a Superman movie in theatres before, and I wasn't that big of a Superman fan. I liked Smallville, but had dropped off that near the end of season 5 when The WB became The CW and here in Canada, the show moved to YTV. I also didn't see the Christopher Reeve Superman films until I was a teenager, and the only actual Superman TV show I watched was Lois & Clark, which I hadn't seen in 20 years by that point. So I wasn't that big of a Superman fan. I came out of the movie not really sure what to make of the movie. I thought it was a good movie on a technical level, but as a story, I just didn't care. I thought Henry Cavill was fine as Superman, I just didn't like his Superman because of the way he was written. Fans of the Snyderverse defend this Superman by saying that he isn't quite Superman yet and is just starting out. I'm sorry but even in the comics, a Superman who is just starting out DOESN'T KILL HIS ENEMIES!!!! He also does his best to minimize collateral damage. In this movie he kills, he does the most amount of damage, and he always looks like he's brooding. Superman isn't supposed to brood. That's Batman's job.

I realize I am in the minority on this, but I don't like Christopher Nolan's Batman films. They're not Batman movies. They have Batman in them, but they aren't Batman movies. As I said earlier, even with his darker persona, Batman is supposed to represent the best Humanity has to offer. Nolan's Batman does not. It's more realistic, in fact all of these movies are more realistic, which completely ignores the fact that these are comic book characters, living in a fictional universe.


Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice was (and is) worse than Man of Steel. It's bleak, colourless, with unlikeable characters. It's no surprise, because that's the kind of movie that Zack Snyder likes to make. Just look at Watchmen and 300. But it's also missing the point of these characters. But, here's the thing, seeing Batman, Superman, and Wonder Woman together on screen, in a single shot, fighting Doomsday made me smile as a comic book fan. This is the kind of thing that I want to see as a comic book fan, because I like these characters so much (in the comics). But the overall execution was horrible. To be honest it took me a few days to make that realization because sitting there in the theatre with my brother and sister (once again), I was taken in by the fact that Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman were on screen, in live action, in a freaking movie, not just on TV, for the first time EVER!!! 

It's also clear that Zack Snyder likes Batman: The Dark Knight Returns by Frank Miller. Because there's callbacks and references to it all over the place in this movie. I've heard that Snyder did an interview at some point where he openly stated that he hated comic books aside from The Dark Knight Returns. Which is not a good thing to say when you're working on movies based on comic books that are supposed to be starting a shared cinematic universe. Especially when Disney is on top with the MCU dominating EVERYTHING. I'll get into this more when I get to the TV shows section.


Suicide Squad was the first DCEU film that I didn't see in theatres, or as soon as it came out on home media. I watched it on DVD, in 2018 because Kelly lent it to me. I have never been a fan of supervillains. They're everything I was taught not to be, and in every TV show and movie I saw when I was a kid they represented EVIL!!! Occasionally, villains like Rita Repulsa, Lord Zedd, Queen Beryl, and Doctor Evil just can't be taken as a serious threat to the heroes. But they still aren't characters we should admire. So when a movie was announced in 2014 that was going to be focused on a group of supervillain team known as Task Force X, or the Suicide Squad, I immediately wanted nothing to do with it. I didn't want to go see it, I didn't want to buy anything surrounding it, I just didn't want it. Here's the thing about running a blog where you review movies. Sometimes you have to see a movie you're not interested in because someone requests you review it. And that's what happened. One of my friends asked me to review Suicide Squad on my old blog, since I had borrowed the DVD from Kelly. I hated it. Not even Will Smith could save it for me and I love Will Smith movies. 


I was extremely late in seeing Wonder Woman. It came out in June 2017, and I ended up not seeing it until August because that was the really weird year for me when it came to movies as I was out of commission from major abdominal surgery for the majority of the year. I enjoyed it as Gal Gadot is an excellent Wonder Woman. However, like the previous DCEU films, it's almost colourless. Even Wonder Woman's costume is toned down with the colours (look at Wonder Woman on the subscription form I showed earlier in this post for reference). I get that in movies you don't want to have a movie that lit too brightly because the light might wash out the scenes, but look at the Marvel movies that have come out since 2008. They're all brightly lit, mostly, and the costumes worn by the characters are even more colourful than Batman and Robin's costumes in the 1966 series. It can be done, but Warner Bros. doesn't seem to want to do it, because of their philosophy concerning DC and the DC Universe being dark and gritty. But again, with Zack Snyder attached to this movie as producer, the visual style of the movie hasn't changed from the previous films. It's still leagues beyond the previous films in terms of quality, but it's still not quite there yet. It does have the distinction of being the first female led superhero movie since Supergirl in 1984, and the first superhero movie to be directed by a woman. So that's cool. Also, I prefer Ares in the Percy Jackson books over Ares in this movie. But that's just me.


Given how much I hated BvS and Suicide Squad, I was not excited for Justice League. Even though Zack Snyder stepped down from the director position on the film and was replaced by Joss Whedon (I also wasn't too thrilled with him at this point), I didn't like these versions of the characters already, except for Wonder Woman, and nothing was going to change my mind at this point. Also I don't like Ezra Miller as an actor, so knowing since BvS that he'd been cast as Barry Allen/the Flash didn't thrill me. Especially because Grant Gustin's suits on the TV show looked ten times better than this movie's suit does, and the TV show has a much smaller budget. All the behind the scenes problems this movie had didn't help matters either. So I skipped it in theatres. I saw it on TV because Space Channel (as it was known as back then) aired it one weekend, and didn't like it. I didn't even bother reviewing it on my old blog. 

The problem this movie has is that it doesn't feel earned. When The Avengers came out in 2012 all of the characters who made up the team were introduced in their own films first or in other people's films as was the case with Black Widow and Hawkeye. Those other movies also came out over the course of four years, allowing us time to get to know those characters and get excited to see them all in a movie together. There was three years between Man of Steel and BvS, a few months between BvS and Suicide Squad, ten months between Suicide Squad and Wonder Woman and then six months between it and Justice League. That totals to about a year and a half between BvS and Justice League with the audience not really knowing who the Flash, Cyborg and Aquaman were since they only had brief cameos in BvS. That left the general audience, who had never read a comic book in their lives, no time to really understand that the Justice League is as big a deal as the Avengers. Especially the younger people who didn't watch Justice League and Justice League Unlimited on TV in the 2000s or Super Friends in the 70s and 80s. 

I would like to stop now and say that if you like these movies that is fine. I'm not here to judge you, or to shame you because you like something that I don't. It's just personally, I don't like these movies and I don't care for Zack Snyder's style as a director. That doesn't mean you can't like them. That's the best part about being able to have our own individual opinions. We can each like the entertainment that we like, while someone else is free to like something else or the same things that we like. 


Aquaman is probably the most confusing movie in the DCEU for me. Aquaman has never been a popular character. He's had some fans within the comic book community, because of things like Peter David's run on the book in the 90s, the character's appearances in various animated projects produced by Bruce Timm. But non comic book reading audiences know him as the hero who can talk to fish thanks to the 60s Aquaman cartoon and the Super Friends cartoons in the 70s and 80s. Which didn't help people's perceptions of him over the years either. Yet this movie, starring Jason Momoa as Aquaman, made $1.148 billion at the box office, worldwide. How does that even happen? Especially when most of what I heard about this movie was pretty negative, though I know at least two people who loved this movie. But still I still heard mainly negative things about this movie. Even before it came out, I wasn't interested in it. Mainly because I didn't care about Momoa's Aquaman in Justice League. He wasn't the worst thing in that movie, that was Ezra Miller's Flash, but I'm not a big Momoa fan to begin with, so having a whole movie centered around him just didn't appeal to me. I'm also not a big Aquaman guy either, so that didn't help things either. 


I was cautiously optimistic about Shazam! because, even though I didn't know a ton about the character, other than he had been competition for Superman in terms of comic book sales in the 1940s, which led to the company that published the character, originally known as Captain Marvel, to go out of business and the character to languish in oblivion for a few decades before DC got a hold of him in the 70s, I was excited to see this movie as I heard it was going to be alot of fun to watch. And it was! Brad and I traveled to Kingston to see the movie with Jonathan on opening day, or the day after opening day and it was so worth it. In fact it was worth it enough for me to buy a physical copy of it on 4K (luckily it has a Blu-ray included) to put in my movie collection and has me somewhat excited for the sequel. I say somewhat because we aren't actually getting it until the spin-off, Black Adam comes out. 


Birds of Prey isn't actually a Birds of Prey film. It's a Harley Quinn film pretending to be a Birds of Prey movie. It's also not a superhero movie. I'm not against a female superhero team film set in the DC Universe under the name Birds of Prey. Far from it. In fact I would love a Birds of Prey movie with the Birds of Prey. These characters aren't them though. The only comic book accurate character in this movie seems to be Harley Quinn, played by the wonderful Margot Robbie, who was my favourite part of Suicide Squad. And honestly, my only problem with this being a Birds of Prey film is that Cassandra Cain is in it, and that Helena Bertinelli doesn't have a mask and cape on. Mainly because when I see Cassandra Cain in a movie, I expect her to be Batgirl or Black Bat or Orphan (her post-Batgirl codenames). Without the costumes, this movie just looks like a generic action movie. Which is sad. I haven't seen the movie, and depending on how things go, I probably won't watch it, because, again it's too generic for this old comic book fan, who happens to like the Birds of Prey. At least the 2002 TV show had Barbara Gordon in the Batgirl costume and Helena in a sort of Huntress costume. But who knows, I might see it anyway. I just didn't have a chance to see it in theatres before the pandemic hit.


We're starting to see a trend where even the best movie in the DCEU (aside from Shazam!) has a sequel that people were disappointed with. From the trailer I saw, Wonder Woman 1984 looks more comic booky than the 2017 movie did. Which is really cool. But for some reason it had lukewarm reception upon release and didn't even make back it's budget, which hasn't happened with a DCEU film before. While BvS and Suicide Squad were critically panned, they still made tons of money, as did the 2017 Justice League movie. This one flopped though. Even my sister, who loved the 2017 movie, was disappointed with this sequel. I missed it because I wasn't paying $30 to rent it on iTunes, and I don't have Crave, which is where it appeared here in Canada, since HBO Max isn't available up here. Maybe someday I'll see it, but for the time being it's not happening.


 Where do I even begin with this movie? Zack Snyder's Justice League is a good example of a movie studio caving to fan demands even though there was no intention of ever putting this movie out. I get many people love this movie, but here's the thing, if you need four hours to tell your story when it's not that complex a story, then it's not a good movie to begin with. We went through this in 2009 with Watchmen. Adding two extra hours to a bad movie doesn't make it a good movie, it just makes it a longer bad movie. There was nothing in the marketing for the Snyder Cut to indicate to me this was a different movie. Snyder had pretty much finished the film when he had to drop out, with Whedon being hired to supervise pickups, editing and post-production. Everything that was put back into the film for the Snyder Cut would've been removed from the movie for it's theatrical release even if Snyder had stayed on to supervise the movie's completion. Which makes this version no different than the Ultimate Edition of BvS or the ultimate cut of Watchmen. I'm not here to sway you from liking this movie. If you DO like this movie, more power to you. I just see it as an unnecessary entity that adds nothing to an already shakey franchise. Now I'm going into movies that are upcoming.


You know what the definition of insanity is right? Doing the same thing over and over again and getting the same results. The Suicide Squad is an example of this. The 2016 Suicide Squad movie didn't work, and while it made tons of money, fans didn't like it. Critics didn't like it. So why would Warner Bros. decide to make a sequel/soft reboot of a film that didn't work? Again, I feel like movies like Suicide Squad, Venom, Joker, and The Suicide Squad glorify villainy. The comics do it too and in most cases a hero's rogues gallery is more popular than the hero themselves. Which is completely backward in my opinion and is the opposite of how I was raised. I realize that the real world is more complex than that, but this generation seems to be more impressionable than previous generations have been, and there needs to be an understanding that the things happening in these movies are not things to be celebrated and the villain characters are not characters to be looked up to. And yet Hollywood continues to make movies focusing on these characters. I won't even get into the Harley Quinn and Joker relationship, because that's all kinds of wrong.


Anytime I have seen the character of Black Adam in the comics, he has been portrayed as a villain. This goes back to what I said in the previous section on The Suicide Squad about glorifying the villains in these pieces. My biggest problem with this particular movie is that the Justice Society of America, who are superheroes by the very definition of the term, are going to be the antagonists to Black Adam's protagonist. That sounds backward and wrong to me, especially because, while I haven't read much with the JSA in it, I have seen them in a few TV shows like Smallville, DC's Legends of Tomorrow and the pilot episode of Stargirl. By portraying them as the enemies of the film's central character, WB is destroying any chance they have of making an awesome JSA film, or TV show in the future. Because people won't want to root for them as they attacked the "hero" Black Adam. It's because of this that I can't get excited for this movie, despite the fact that Dwayne Johnson is playing Black Adam, and he's going to be awesome in it. 


The last movie I want to talk about before I move on to the TV shows is The Flash. Of all the DCEU films I am the most torn about this movie. As I mentioned before, I am not a fan of Ezra Miller or his version of the Flash. However, I am curious to see how they handle the amount of material that's going to be in this film. Mainly because the DC Multiverse is going to be introduced in this film with the inclusion of Michael Keaton returning to his role as Bruce Wayne/Batman from Batman (1989) and Batman Returns (1992). Mind you, unlike the Arrowverse, which introduced the concept of the multiverse over the span of five seasons of The Flash and several seasons of Arrow, Supergirl, and DC's Legends of Tomorrow, this movie is just going to throw it at the audience, expecting them to understand and accept it within a two hour time period, while rebooting the DCEU. They're also introducing Supergirl in this movie for some reason. 

There are so many other movies in development or rumoured to be in development that I can't talk about all of them here. There are two that I'm interested in and that's Batgirl and Nightwing. Look you guys, I'm a Batman fan first and foremost and that extends to the Batman Family as well. So when WB announces movies starring Batgirl and Nightwing, you better believe I'm going to be following the production of both films with great interest. Now, onto the TV shows that I want to talk about, because I feel the TV shows better capture the heroic nature of the DC Universe than any of the movies have since Superman Returns in 2006. 


Before 2012 I wasn't overly familiar with the character of Green Arrow. I'd never read a comic starring him and I'd already dropped off of Smallville by the time Justin Hartley was cast in the role on the show. Yet when it was announced that a Green Arrow TV show had been greenlit, for some reason I was intrigued. I don't even know why I was even interested since I knew nothing about the character. I think it's because that first season focused on Oliver Queen as a person, rather than as a hero and that pilot hooked me. Plus Stephen Amell was amazing in the role. It also helped that two actresses that I was familiar with were regulars on the show too. Susanna Thompson, who played the Borg Queen on Star Trek: Voyager, and Willa Holland, who played Kaitlin Cooper in the final two seasons of The O.C. So that was pretty cool. The reason I didn't mind Oliver killing the bad guys here whereas I did mind it in the DCEU films, is that here Oliver is struggling to get away from killing criminals and it's a journey that he has to go through, but eventually he does stop doing it, unless absolutely necessary.


The Flash introduced the hero aspect to the Arrowverse. Barry is a selfless person and when he got his powers, and with some encouragement from the Arrow (Oliver's original codename) Barry used his powers to help people. He became the symbol of hope that Oliver knew the Arrow could never be due to all the horrors he went through during his five years away from Starling City. And in those early seasons of both shows I watched every week because I saw why I kept reading Batman comics, kept reading Superman comics, and got into Green Arrow comics. Because they are the people that I aspire to be every single day of my life, even though I don't have super powers or special training. The movies do not do that. Sadly, I had to stop watching The Flash because the writing got so bad that I stopped seeing Barry as an inspiration and started seeing him as an idiot. Supergirl had a different problem.


When Supergirl started, it was basically a Superman series, starring Supergirl, because WB was too busy butchering Superman over in the movies and their deal with the Siegel Estate didn't allow for a live action Superman TV series to be on the air while Superman was being used in movies. They still snuck him in either by shooting someone from behind or showing him in silhouette, but it wasn't until the show's second season in 2016, following the disaster of BvS that they cast Tyler Hoechlin in the role of Clark Kent/Superman. Fans and viewers responded to how Hoechlin portrayed the character, which led to Superman & Lois being produced this year. The reason I stopped watching Supergirl except for the crossovers is because, not only was Kara acting like a high school teenager, but the show got a little too preachy. I didn't mind the message, as it was a valid one, and one they often relayed on the various Star Trek shows, but I don't want to feel like I'm listening to a sermon when I'm trying to relax. The writers weren't being as subtle about it as the Star Trek writers were either. Have a message, talk about current issues like racism, sexism, tolerance etc. But don't tell the audience to come down on one side or the other, regardless of the side you're on personally. Star Trek never did that, in any of it's incarnations.


And then there's DC's Legends of Tomorrow. It's the one DC Comics based show from the original Arrowverse lineup that relishes in the fact that it's based on comic book characters. Season 1 was pretty bad, but after that they embraced the ridiculous and took us on a ride. To this day, while season 5 was kind of hit and miss as they had just come out of Crisis on Infinite Earths, and all the Arrowverse shows were weird coming out of that major crossover, I can't wait for a new episode of this show. The time travel aspect isn't really a big deal on this show anymore. Sometimes they don't go to a different time period even. Or if they do, they don't do it to fix a problem with the timeline necessarily. Instead it's become a show about a family who fix problems with the timeline while fighting aliens, mythical creatures, demons, and dead supervillains and cleaning up John Constantine's messes left over from his own short lived TV series. And they do it without being too melodramatic or serious. It's a fun show and probably the one that has changed for the better out of all of the original Arrowverse shows.


I don't even care whether we have good Superman movies or not right now, because I have the best comic book based TV show on the air right now. You all know how I feel about Superman & Lois because I've talked about it enough on this blog, but I will not stop talking about it, because after 13 episodes, with only two more left in the season, this show continues to be amazing. It's like the one time The CW walked away from the show, because they didn't want to tell the showrunners how to do a Superman TV series. I've said this before, but I can imagine CW execs being like, "You wanna do a Superman series? Great, go do it, we're not gonna make you screw it up! Byyyye!!!" when the producers pitched this series to them in 2018 or early 2019 (it was announced in October 2019). Especially when Tyler Hoechlin was so well received when he was first cast on Supergirl back in 2016. The final two shows I want to talk about are ones I haven't paid much attention to but would like to talk about because the new season for both shows is starting very soon.


The first show I want to talk about is Titans. I've been super wary of this show since it started in 2018. Mainly because the initial trailer for the first season painted the show in a very negative light with the ultra violence and Robin dropping an F-bomb. Very much like the DCEU films in that regard. Since then I've only seen the pilot so far, but I bought the entire first season on iTunes and I'm planning on getting into it very soon, but from what I've seen they've gotten away from that edgy feel and brought it more to the traditional Teen Titans vibe. I used the poster for the upcoming third season because I almost started crying when I saw it. I see Nightwing, Beast Boy/Changling, Wonder Girl/Troia (not sure which name Donna Troy goes by on the show), Oracle, Starfire, Red Hood, Superboy, and Hawk & Dove as if they had just leapt off the pages of The New Teen Titans and Teen Titans and that gives me chills, because it's so brilliant seeing these characters translated into live action. That wouldn't've happened 20 years ago when Smallville first started airing.


The final show I want to talk about is Stargirl. I've heard alot of good things about this show, but the first season only just became available on iTunes here in Canada, and didn't air anywhere else during it's run on the DC Universe app and The CW. My only real concern about this show, going into the first season is that it's a teenage superhero show, set in a small town high school, airing on The CW, which I don't have much tolerance for these days after bad experiences with Riverdale and The Chilling Adventures of Sabrina

Even if I don't end up liking Titans or Stargirl, I'm still glad these shows, along with Batwoman, Black Lightning, and Doom Patrol, are on because there are characters I'm not super familiar with because they've never been shown on TV before and will probably never get their own movies, because they were overshadowed decades ago by Batman and Superman and the people who don't read comics, don't know who these other characters are. The same thing goes for the DCEU and other DC Comics based movies. I may not like the direction WB is taking them in, but I'm glad that they're finally getting DC Comics out there because I am a fan of DC Comics and I want to see these characters become known to the general audience and gain new fans, even if they don't do anything for comic book sales. Because if it weren't for Arrow I would never have become a fan of Green Arrow and gotten to meet the man who revitalized the character in the 80s, Mike Grell, at Ottawa Comiccon a couple of years ago. 

Alright my friends that's going to be it for me for today. I really wanted to talk about DC Comics indepth because I've never done that before on here. I will be back tomorrow for my review of the 2000 Nickelodeon movie, Snow Day starring Stephen Stills from Scott Pilgrim vs. The World (2010) and Lana Lang from Superman & Lois. Until then have a great evening and I will talk to you all later. Take care.